Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 28.06.2025 12:22

Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
What is the top-rated beach resort in Bali, Indonesia according to TripAdvisor reviews?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
What’s next?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sam’s Club Just Made a Change to Its Rotisserie Chicken - Allrecipes
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Is it true that most women like alpha males?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Thank you.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Yankees lose no-hit bid on controversial check swing call - New York Post
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Just in the last 5 years:
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
What’s the best AI coding tool for beginners?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.